Robert, Charles, I totally agree with you. Here’s my side.
At first I support prohibition of marriage as “parody” to show how stupid prohibition of prostitution is. So yea, Robert is right. Charles is right.
Tačiau, after a while, I do see reasonable reasons:
1. Consistency. Why prostitution is illegal and marriage is sanctified? It’s like legalizing coca cola and criminalizing pepsi. What do you think Robert?
2. Prohibition of marriage hurt no body. If you want ANY commitment for ANY reason, there is always regular contract laws you can craft. Worst come to worst you can make it exactly the same like civil marriage.
3. Prohibition of marriage can be interpreted to mean blocking government from recoqnizing civil marriage. Government should not have any power to decide what marriage, rutabaga, or anything mean. It’s all up to individuals.
4. When civil marriage is gone, many similar arangements will show up replacing it. It’s easy for government now to prohibit those competing arangements. When civil marriage is gone, the difference between commitments as defined by civil marriage and other kind of commitments will blur and it’ll be much harder for government to prohibit one and legalize the other.
5. Most importantly, marriage is indeed sucks. There are many males whose whole life are destroyed due to marriage. I do not like this argument because it’s the exact same argument used to prohibit prostitution and it’s still up to individuals to choose. But there you have it. It’s still a reasonable argument anyway.
6. Prostitution is actually far more efficient than marriage. Most people would choose sugar relationship over marriage. Currently the latter counts as prostitution.
Why Marriage Should be Prohibited is a post from: Laisvosios rinkos Visada
Gaunamus paieškos terminus:
- powered by phpBB definition of fitness (17)
