If women want alimony, that’s fine. She need to simply demand that before marriage rather than getting that term automatically set up for her.
The way it’s set up, it tends to get in the way of women preferring the rich, and hence doesn’t serve interests of hot babes that want richer men.
Most such women, just want cash.
Men are only misogynists to ugly women.
Even then, it’s not by much. Men hate ugly women as much as they hate other men. It’ll be even less than the degree men hate handsome, tall, rich, intelligent, and promiscuous men. For most men, that means not at all.
If I see young ugly women, I just run away. I don’t hate them. I just don’t get near them. That’s all. I don’t feel like it. That’s all. No harm done.
Actually if women do want exclusivity, alimony, and bigger child support payment from richer men, I would totally support that.
They just have to ask for it before the start of the relationship.
Currently a man just hang out with a girl, and suddenly, boom, government declare they are man and wife, and suddenly the men may be liable for alimony and huge child support for kids that’s not even his.
The way this is set up make rich men run away from hot babes. It’s not toward women’s best interest to be avoided by richer men.
It should be up to her, rather than government, to decide how much and what she wants from a relationship.
Many hot babes don’t mind getting just sperms if it’s from nobel prize winners. So it’s her right. Case close.
Some hot babe may want exclusivity, testimonial, ir tt. That is her right, but she just have to explicitly negotiate that before the first fuck. Let’s see who get fertilized by higher quality cock.
Alimony can be fine is a post from: Laisvosios rinkos Visada
Gaunamus paieškos terminus:
- powered by phpBB funny looking ugly people (30)
- powered by phpBB easy to make weapons (4)